Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Adus topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission backs expanded in‑law accessory units for Districts 3 and 8, with conditions
Summary
The Planning Commission voted 4–2 to recommend expanding rules to allow accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in Supervisorial Districts 3 and 8, aligning unit thresholds with seismic‑retrofit standards and adding a retail‑conversion prohibition; commissioners and residents debated outreach, parking and short‑term‑rental risks.
The San Francisco Planning Commission voted on July 16 to recommend approval of ordinances from Supervisors Scott Wiener and Christina Olague to expand where accessory dwelling units (ADUs) may be created. The proposals would extend the city’s existing in‑law/ADU allowances beyond the Castro pilot and seismic‑retrofit program to larger parts of District 8 and to District 3. Planning staff recommended aligning District 3 and District 8 rules with the seismic‑retrofit standard (one ADU allowed in buildings under five units; no cap for larger buildings) and requested a small buffer around the supervisor’s residence be removed.
Supporters, including neighborhood housing advocates and the San Francisco Association of Realtors, argued ADUs are a low‑impact, relatively low‑cost way to add rent‑controlled units dispersed across neighborhoods. “ADUs are one piece of the solution to our housing crisis,” a pro‑housing speaker said during public comment. Housing advocates and developers said legalized ADUs could bring unsafe, illegal basement and garage units up to building‑code standards.
Opponents asked for more localized outreach in District 3 and raised concerns about parking, neighborhood character, and potential conversions to short‑term rentals. Several speakers urged the commission to require clearer procedures to notify the assessor and ensure property tax/valuation adjustments when new units are added.
Commissioners were split on readiness: some said District 8’s prior pilot work made it appropriate to move forward; others said District 3 needed more targeted outreach. The commission adopted staff‑recommended modifications (including a prohibition on converting ground‑floor retail into ADUs), asked staff to publish an ADU handbook and to track applications, and voted 4–2 to send the recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. Commissioners Moore and Wu voted no. The Board will consider the ordinances and any further amendments in subsequent hearings.
What’s next: The Planning Department will present the staff ADU handbook in September and the measures proceed to the Board of Supervisors where additional public hearings and possible amendments are expected.
