Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the 4th St Restaurant topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves Fourth Street restaurant with conditions after neighborhood debate on music, green roof and hours

San Francisco Planning Commission · June 25, 2015
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After heated public comment, the Planning Commission approved a conditional-use authorization for a restaurant/bar at 4022 Fourth Street with a rear-yard modification offset by a green roof, a mandatory noise limiter, and narrowed hours for operations and amplified entertainment, plus six-month and one-year check-ins.

The Planning Commission approved a conditional-use authorization and rear-yard modification for a proposed restaurant/bar at 4022–2620 Fourth Street on June 25, after extensive neighborhood opposition focusing on amplified entertainment, late-night hours and loss of a vegetated mid‑block yard.

The sponsor revised the design following prior continuances: the plan keeps a commercial ground floor and installs a partial rear-yard roof garden (green roof) and a three-foot setback to allow planting of wax myrtle trees along the rear property line. Project counsel said the rear-roof structure will be enclosed and have no openings to reduce sound transmission. Acoustical consultant testimony emphasized improved isolation and a two‑step mitigation plan: architectural sound containment followed by operational limits enforced to city noise standards.

Neighbors urged stricter limits or denial, citing prior complaints about nightlife at the site, concerns that a reopened venue could become a nuisance, and doubts that a three-foot planter provides meaningful canopy or ecological replacement. An ecologist and the project—s arborist supported the proposed species and planting approach and confirmed wax myrtle can thrive in constrained urban planters.

Commissioners negotiated a conditional package: the project is approved provided it installs an approved noise limiter calibrated to meet entertainment‑commission or city acoustical standards, and the Commission limited both hours of operation and live/amplified entertainment. The adopted conditions set unified operating and entertainment hours instead of a complex, day‑by‑day schedule: operations and entertainment are permitted 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The Commission also required an informational check-in at six months and a presentation at one year. The motion passed unanimously.

The Zoning Administrator indicated inclination to grant the rear-yard modification and asked the sponsor and staff to continue refining the green-roof design.

The decision attempts a middle ground: allow a revitalized ground-floor commercial use that developer and some neighbors say will improve an underused block while imposing acoustical technology and limits intended to protect adjacent residences.