Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Planning staff outlines when draft EIR comment periods should be extended under CEQA

San Francisco Planning Commission · December 18, 2014
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Environmental Review Officer Sarah Jones told the Planning Commission the standard CEQA draft EIR review period is 45 days and outlined circumstances — multiple sites, missing initial study, major holidays or access issues — that warrant setting a longer review period at publication or, rarely, extending to 60+ days with written findings.

Sarah Jones, the Planning Department’s Environmental Review Officer, presented a staff memo explaining how the department applies CEQA and Chapter 31 of the Administrative Code to set draft EIR review periods. Jones said the standard CEQA comment period is 45 days and that the ERO will consider longer review periods at publication — not by extension after the fact — when projects involve multiple…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans