Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Condominium Legalization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board sides with permit holder in 1580 Great Highway dispute but removes bike‑parking requirement
Summary
The Board of Appeals granted an appeal related to Unit 3 at 1580 Great Highway with a condition removing proposed bicycle parking from the plans; commissioners said many CC&R disputes are civil matters but found the permit complied with planning and building rules, with modifications.
Get email alerts on the Condominium Legalization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The San Francisco Board of Appeals on Aug. 28 approved revised plans for an alteration/legalization permit at 1580 Great Highway (permit 201901180726) but directed the plan be revised to remove proposed bicycle parking that HOA members said encroached on deeded space. Commissioners emphasized that many of the disputes raised by the HOA (CC&Rs, alleged subdivision and common‑area encroachment) are civil matters between co‑owners and do not, by themselves, render a project noncompliant with planning code.
The HOA president, Scott Schulman, and multiple unit owners testified that the permit appears to subdivide a deeded unit and incurs work in common areas without HOA approval; they asked the board to revoke the permit and send the project back to DBI. Permit holder counsel Christina Chen said the unit’s existing layout predated her client’s purchase and argued the legalization ordinance allows the department to bring the unit into compliance; the permit, she said, does not intend to create a separately sold condominium unit or otherwise subdivide the parcel for separate financing.
Planning and DBI staff reviewed zoning, density limits and building safety, noting the parcel’s history and that the legalization ordinance provides a path for previously unauthorized units to be legalized in many cases. DBI staff flagged valuation and licensing issues that can be addressed as inspections proceed. After discussion, Commissioner Honda moved to grant the appeal but require the plans be revised to remove bicycle parking from the common garage area; the motion carried 4–0. Commissioners urged the parties to pursue civil remedies for private contract or CC&R disputes and noted that building inspectors will verify code compliance in follow‑up inspections.
