Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conditional Use Alcohol topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Liquid Gold tasting room with conditions after neighborhood debate
Summary
The Planning Commission granted conditional-use approval to Liquid Gold, a craft beer and wine tasting room at 1040 Hyde St., limiting operations to ABC type 42 (beer & wine), reduced late hours and required a one‑year report back after opening following concerns from neighbors about alcohol concentrations on Polk and California streets.
The Planning Commission on Dec. 10 approved a conditional‑use permit for Liquid Gold, a craft beer and small‑batch wine tasting room proposed at 1040 Hyde Street in Nob Hill.
Planning staff recommended approval with conditions designed to reduce neighborhood impacts: a condition limiting the business to an ABC type‑42 license (on‑sale beer and wine only); restricted hours — midnight Sunday–Thursday and 1 a.m. Friday and Saturday; and limiting retail (off‑sale) beer and wine to one‑third of gross floor area and locating it in the rear of the store. The Police Department’s Alcohol Licensing Unit supported the conditions and the commission required a one‑year report back.
Project sponsor Tim Lee told commissioners the concept emphasizes San Francisco breweries and small winemakers and includes education and community events. "Liquid Gold will be my contribution back to the city," he said, arguing the small footprint and local focus differ from other liquor establishments.
Neighbors and neighborhood organizations were split. Linda Chapman and Robert Garcia described ongoing safety and disorder on nearby Polk and California Streets and urged denial, warning additional alcohol licenses could exacerbate problems. Operators of a nearby business, The Hideout, submitted a petition with 60 signatures opposing new licenses near their block. Opponents also argued the type‑42 license affords off‑sale privileges that could increase late‑night activity.
Supporters — merchants and nearby residents — said the applicant did outreach and described the proposal as a different, quieter format that could complement existing businesses. Commissioners balanced those concerns and approved the permit unanimously, adding the required limits on the liquor type and hours and asking staff to return with a one‑year report on operations.
The motion passed by roll call: Antonini, Borden, Hillis, Moore, Sugaiya and Chair Wu voted aye, 6–0.
