Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transit Impact Fee topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission endorses cleanup of transit‑impact fee code, asks for explicit housing referral if fee ever applied to housing

San Francisco Planning Commission · December 12, 2013
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning Department staff framed Substitute Ordinance 130,938 as an administrative clarification that would defer to development‑agreement terms and adjust timing of fee calculation; commissioners adopted an added finding that any future amendment bringing housing under the fee be re‑referred to the Planning Commission.

Lisa Chen, a planner in the citywide division, presented proposed amendments to the Transit Impact Development Fee (TIDF) code that would clarify exemptions for projects subject to development agreements, change the calculation timing to the first construction document, and tighten some administrative deadlines.

"For these types of projects, the proposed ordinance specifies that the terms of that relevant agreement or similar document would determine whether or not the project is exempt from TIDF," Chen said, describing the change as an effort to align practice across redevelopment and development agreements.

Public commenter Calvin Welch of the Council of Community Housing Organizations urged the commission to add explicit language shielding City‑funded or permanently affordable housing and certain human‑service projects from any TIDF charges. Commissioners and staff debated whether the draft alters the longstanding exclusion of housing from the fee. Planning staff and the director reiterated that housing is not being newly charged under this ordinance and that the measure is intended as administrative clarification.

Commissioners agreed to add an explicit finding: if the ordinance is later amended to include housing, it should be re‑referred to the Planning Commission for review. The commission adopted that finding unanimously and advanced its advisory recommendation to the Board of Supervisors.