Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Formula Retail topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission denies Chipotle conditional-use application at 2100 Market amid neighborhood concern about formula retail concentration

San Francisco Planning Commission · June 20, 2013
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hours of testimony from both sides the commission voted 5–1 to disapprove Chipotle’s conditional-use request at 2100 Market, citing the adopted 20% formula-retail concentration policy and neighborhood character concerns; staff had recommended disapproval because the 300-foot radius calculation (including parking lot frontages) raised concentration to ~36%.

The Planning Commission declined a conditional-use authorization for Chipotle at 2100 Market Street by a 5–1 vote after a lengthy hearing with dozens of public speakers. Staff recommended disapproval under the commission’s 300-foot radius policy for formula retail concentration: using commercial frontage calculations (which in this case included parking-lot frontages that serve nearby formula-retail uses), staff said the proposed Chipotle would raise the formula-retail concentration in the immediate radius to approximately 36 percent, above the 20-percent threshold the department uses as guidance.

Supporters including the Castro Upper Market Community Benefit District and the property owners argued the corner has been vacant for two years and that Chipotle’s proposed tenant improvements, local sourcing commitments and community outreach would revitalize a blighted site. Opponents — including multiple neighborhood associations, the DuBose Triangle Neighborhood Association and neighboring independent restaurants — argued the corner is a gateway to a unique neighborhood commercial corridor, that local businesses would be harmed by another chain, and that the Commission previously adopted a policy to limit formula retail concentration.

Commissioners debated the merits of vacancy versus concentration metrics, whether the policy should consider parking-lot frontages and whether a 300-foot radius is the right analytical unit. Several commissioners stressed neighborhood character and the importance of keeping gateway corners anchored by independent businesses. After discussion the Commission moved to disapprove the conditional use; the motion passed 5–1 with Commissioner Antonini dissenting.