Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Project Timing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission adopts one‑time "stimulus" opt‑in for expired permits, votes 4‑3 to extend look‑back to 10 years
Summary
The Planning Commission approved a one‑time opt‑in program allowing projects whose 3‑year performance periods lapsed to obtain building permits after enrolling in a 60‑day window; commissioners voted 4‑3 to extend eligibility to projects approved up to 10 years earlier.
The San Francisco Planning Commission on Thursday approved a one‑time "stimulus" opt‑in policy that lets previously approved projects whose three‑year performance periods have lapsed obtain building permits if they enroll during a 60‑day window and pull permits within 18 months.
Dan Seider, a Planning Department staffer who presented the proposal, said the program is intended to help projects stalled by the recession move forward. "This policy would allow building permit issuance after a project's three‑year performance period has run," Seider said during his presentation. Staff noted roughly 190 qualifying projects in the last eight years and estimated that expanding the look‑back to 10 years would add about 15 projects and roughly 400 dwelling units to the pool of potential enrollments.
Commissioners debated the program’s scope and timing at length. Supporters argued the opt‑in would restart stalled housing and commercial projects without changing long‑standing review standards. Opponents warned that expanding the retrospective window could revive projects that no longer meet current neighborhood plans or recent zoning changes.
Commissioner Antonini moved to extend eligibility to projects approved within the last 10 years; that motion passed 4‑3, with Commissioners Moore, Segayan and Wu voting no. Under the approved framework, enrollment will be open for 60 days following adoption; projects approved in the chosen look‑back period can opt in and then have 18 months to obtain required permits. The policy does not change the "law of the day" requirement: permits remain subject to the current planning code and CEQA review when applicable.
The department will mail notices to project sponsors and property owners and will publish details about which projects are eligible. Staff said projects already subject to specific timeframes or commission‑mandated requirements would not qualify. Seider and commissioners emphasized the policy is a one‑time measure that can be modified or revoked at later publicly noticed hearings.
The commission instructed staff to monitor enrollment and provide a list of opted‑in projects during the 60‑day period.
