Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise Entertainment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission pauses Paina Lounge entertainment permit, orders independent acoustical workup
Summary
The Planning Commission continued a contentious application by Paina Lounge to expand live amplified performances after neighbors, Sundance Kabuki and the Entertainment Commission raised noise‑bleed concerns. Commissioners ordered a mutually agreed independent acoustical study and continued the item to April 11.
The San Francisco Planning Commission on Feb. 7 voted to continue a disputed conditional‑use request by Paina Lounge, a new restaurant in Japantown seeking broader live amplified entertainment and extended hours, ordering an independent acoustical study before any approval.
Neighboring businesses and residents, including Sundance Kabuki and Kabuki Hot Springs and Spa, told the commission they have repeatedly experienced sound bleed from Paina’s performances and said the cinema had issued customer refunds because noise intruded on screenings. Planning staff and the Entertainment Commission inspector reported that Paina had received citations for operating past 10 p.m. and for exceeding earlier sound limits; the restaurant paid and abated the citations, staff said.
Paina’s owner, John Chang, and an acoustical consultant presented measurements they said showed the venue could operate with a sound limiter and exhaust/sound‑mitigation in place. Opposing acoustical expert Charles Salter reviewed that report and told commissioners he found methodological flaws and said the measurements could not be relied on to certify compliance with the municipal noise code.
Commissioners requested a neutral technical path forward. They voted unanimously to continue the item to April 11 and directed the parties to either mutually select a sound consultant or pay for an independent study (shared cost to be negotiated). The commission also asked that the Entertainment Commission staff and its sound inspector participate in the scope and testing protocol; results must demonstrate “no disturbance” in the adjacent theater or spa at realistic maximum operational levels.
The commission emphasized its preference for bringing the venue into regulatory oversight rather than leaving complaints to 311 or police enforcement, but said it would not grant expanded entertainment privileges without clear, expert‑verified evidence that mitigation will protect adjacent uses. The continuation gives Paina time to complete documented soundproofing work and to demonstrate results acceptable to adjacent property owners, the Entertainment Commission and planning staff.
Next step: the commission will revisit the application on April 11 after the independent acoustical workup is completed and reviewed by staff, the Entertainment Commission and affected neighbors.
