Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Board continues debate over 25 Lusk rooftop after permittee submits new sound study
Summary
After neighbors objected to noise and hours of operation for a proposed rooftop dining area at 25 Lusk, the board continued the case to Sept. 27 to allow review of a newly submitted consultant noise study, revised plans and a clear statement of hours of commercial operation.
The San Francisco Board of Appeals continued a long‑running dispute over a proposed rooftop dining area at 25 Lusk Street to Sept. 27 after permit counsel presented a new noise measurement and mitigation analysis.
Neighbors appealed earlier approvals and objected to both the rooftop use and direct communications they said had been made to the board; one appellant alleged the permittee had prompted outside contacts and submitted new evidence by email in ways the appellant said violated board rules. The appellant asked that any new evidence not be accepted without time to rebut and asked the board to deny the permit or impose stricter curfew and mitigation conditions.
Permit counsel told the board that a…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
