Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 2175 Market topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission denies appeal of Market Octavia PMND; approves 2175 Market Street project with conditions
Summary
After neighborhood opposition raised traffic and unit-size concerns, the Planning Commission denied an appeal of the Market Octavia PMND and voted unanimously to approve conditional-use authorization for a 6‑story mixed‑use project at 2175 Market Street (88 units, ~13 on‑site affordable units, 44 parking spaces) with variances granted for site constraints.
The Planning Commission considered an appeal of a focused Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration (PMND) for 2175 Market Street, a project proposing demolition of an existing gas station and construction of a six‑story, mixed‑use building with 88 residential units (including on‑site below‑market-rate units), about 6,300 square feet of retail and 44 off‑street parking spaces. Appellant Scott Stawicki and several neighbors argued that existing traffic at the Market/Sanchez/15th intersection has degraded beyond the conditions analyzed in the Market Octavia Environmental Impact Report and that additional cumulative impacts warrant further environmental review.
Planning Department staff and several neighborhood organizations countered that the Market Octavia FEIR had previously identified significant unavoidable impacts at that intersection and that the proposed project fits the plan-area densities and the community plan exemption process; staff recommended denying the appeal. After public testimony that included both opposition (traffic, unit sizes, family‑friendly unit concerns) and endorsements (design, inclusionary units, transit-first parking ratio) commissioners debated mitigation, curb-cut policy and potential use of community-impact fees for intersection improvements. The commission voted to deny the appeal and uphold the PMND, then voted to approve the conditional-use authorization, adopting CEQA findings and granting variances based on the lot's unusual shape and constraints.
Project sponsor representatives said unit sizes vary (smallest two‑bedrooms near 750 sq ft, largest up to ~1,100 sq ft) and that the project provides additional bicycle parking, divisible retail bays tailored for local businesses, rooftop open space and on‑site affordable housing (standard 15% on‑site requirement; sponsor aims for 20% on‑site if tax‑exempt bond financing is secured). The zoning administrator noted that the project meets variance criteria owing to lot topography and shape. The commission’s approvals included standard conditions of approval and CEQA findings; the zoning administrator indicated decision letters and the 10‑day appeal window would follow.
