Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Playfields topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission upholds environmental finding for Ocean View playfield renovation amid health concerns over artificial turf

San Francisco Planning Commission · September 20, 2012
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission voted to uphold a preliminary mitigated negative declaration for a renovation of Minnie and Lovie Ward playfields to synthetic turf, amid testimony from an appellant citing cancer risks tied to SBR crumb infill and testimony from Rec & Park and community supporters about field demand and safety improvements.

The Planning Commission voted to uphold the Planning Department's preliminary mitigated negative declaration (PMND) for the Minnie and Lovie Ward playfields renovation project, denying an appeal that argued the environmental review failed to account for reported human-health risks associated with SBR (styrene-butadiene rubber) crumb infill.

Planning staff (Don Lewis) summarized the project and the PMND record. The renovation would replace an existing grass field with synthetic turf and install multiple light standards; the PMND reviewed inhalation, ingestion and dermal-contact pathways and concluded impacts were less than significant based on currently available studies. "Staff believes that no substantial evidence of a significant environmental effect has been presented that warrant preparation of the EIR," Lewis said.

Appellant Kelly Watts argued the PMND failed to address studies and chemicals associated with carbon black in crumb rubber and said that several carbon-black constituents are listed under California's Proposition 65 and other state lists. Watts urged the commission to require alternatives and further analysis: "Carbon black is listed by the state of California to cause cancer or birth defects," the appellant said, urging a more thorough review.

Recreation and Park Department project manager Dan Maurer and many community speakers defended the renovation as a necessary response to field conditions and program demand. Maurer said prior synthetic turf projects in San Francisco have increased field hours and broadened programming; he described plans for site improvements, dugouts, benches, bikes racks and water fountains.

After public testimony, Commissioner Borden moved to uphold the PMND (deny the appeal). The motion carried by roll call and the Planning Commission affirmed staff's finding.

Why it matters: The vote clears the Recreation and Park Department to proceed with a multi-use field renovation the department and community groups say will double usable hours and expand recreation programming. Appellants and some residents remain concerned about the adequacy of evidence on long-term health impacts from specific infill materials.

Next steps: Rec & Park may proceed with project design and implementation consistent with the PMND and mitigation measures; opponents may pursue other administrative or legal options outside this hearing record.