Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Retail Formula Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission allows CVS to replace Walgreens at Haight & Fillmore with conditions
Summary
The commission approved a conditional use authorization and related variance allowing CVS to occupy the former Walgreens space at Haight and Fillmore, finding the proposed use replaces an existing formula retail tenant and will restore neighborhood pharmacy service; approval includes a condition requiring interior window transparency to remain unobstructed.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve a conditional use authorization for a CVS pharmacy to occupy the ground‑floor commercial space at 491–499 Haight Street and granted related variances tied to rebuilding following a September 2011 fire.
"Since the project replaces a previously existing formula retail use at this site, the project will not affect the concentration of formula retail uses in the district," Elizabeth Waddy of the Planning Department told the commission as she summarized the formula‑retail review criteria. The department recommended approval with conditions, including mandatory storefront transparency at the pedestrian level.
Sponsor representatives said the location would restore neighborhood pharmacy service where none currently exists and would activate the ground floor with larger glazed storefronts. Public commenters included longtime neighborhood residents and tenants concerned about residential alterations and tenant return; merchants and neighborhood groups including the Merchants of Upper Market and Eureka Valley associations testified in favor on the grounds of extensive outreach and negotiated benefits.
Commissioners questioned whether the staff should routinely supply a nearby formula‑retail inventory for context but agreed that this proposal is a like‑for‑like replacement of a pharmacy use in the same tenant space. Commissioners emphasized the condition limiting interior obstructions at the windows so the retail frontage remains transparent and pedestrian‑oriented.
The commission approved both the conditional use authorization and the requested variances by unanimous vote. The amendments to the project’s residential reconfiguration and building code items will be handled through other permit channels; tenants were told tenant‑rights and rent‑board questions are dealt with by the Rent Board and building permit processes.
The project’s next steps are final plan corrections and compliance with the transparency condition during tenant fit‑out, followed by building permits and tenant improvements.
