Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environmental Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors press Planning Commission on safety, traffic and slope risks during San Francisco Overlook DEIR hearing
Summary
At a long public hearing, residents raised concerns about emergency access, parking, geotechnical hazards and construction staging in the draft EIR for the San Francisco Overlook residential project; staff will respond in a written comments-and-responses document.
The Planning Commission held an extended public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the San Francisco Overlook project, a proposed 34‑unit residential development, and heard a broad range of neighborhood testimony focusing on the adequacy of the environmental document.
Lisa Gibson of the Planning Department framed the session as a DEIR adequacy hearing and reminded speakers to confine comments to the environmental review. Dozens of neighbors told commissioners they were not opposed to housing per se but questioned the DEIR’s treatment of parking, traffic, emergency vehicle access and hillside stability.
"If San Francisco Overlook were built at its current proposed scale, there would be an additional 60 to 70 cars attempting to drive in and out of our street throughout the day," said Jennifer Khan, a Crestmont Drive resident. Several speakers said spot traffic counts in the DEIR missed evening parking peaks and that tight, 26‑foot neighborhood streets and steep sidewalks hinder transit and emergency response.
Other commenters flagged landslide and geotechnical risks, requesting further investigation of a sewer drain line, slope stabilization measures and peer‑review recommendations. Planning staff and commissioners said commenters’ concerns will be addressed in the DEIR comments‑and‑responses document; the public comment period remained open for written submissions through June 19, 2012.
Commissioners thanked residents for detailed input and noted that the environmental comment process — not project approval — was the purpose of the hearing. Several commissioners praised the DEIR’s readability while noting specific issues (sidewalk adequacy, retaining‑wall access, emergency egress) that staff must address in the written responses.
