Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Formula Retail 2199 Market topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves Verizon formula‑retail store at 2199 Market; encourages sponsor to honor neighborhood signage agreement
Summary
Commissioners approved a conditional use authorization for a Verizon premium retail store at 2199 Market Street and encouraged the project sponsor to follow a near‑agreement with the DuBose Triangle Neighborhood Association on signage and storefront conditions after public testimony.
The Planning Commission approved a conditional use request to convert a vacant storefront at 2199 Market Street into a Verizon Wireless premium retailer, while urging the sponsor and neighborhood group to finalize an agreement on storefront signage and illumination.
Sharon Lai of the planning department recommended approval with conditions, noting the proposal would occupy a small, neighborhood‑serving storefront in the Upper Market NCT and would replace a vacancy. Staff advised that sign approvals are governed by the planning code (Article 6, section 604/604A) and that code‑compliant signs are non‑discretionary.
Rashid, speaking for the project sponsor, described his family‑owned chain of wireless specialty stores and said the sponsor was flexible on signage and other neighborhood concerns but must follow Verizon’s branding guidelines. DuBose Triangle Neighborhood Association (DTNA) representative Eric Honda presented survey data showing formula retail growth in the corridor and said DTNA would be willing to support the project if the sponsor limited signs and interior illumination to preserve neighborhood character (DTNA proposed a single Market‑facing sign, no Sanchez‑facing sign, limited illumination and no neon tubing).
Deputy city attorney Susan Cleveland Knowles advised commissioners that sign rules in section 604 are largely non‑discretionary: if a sign complies with code dimensions and placement it must be approved; however, the neighborhood and sponsor can enter private agreements to further restrict signage.
Commissioner Moore moved approval and asked that the record reflect the Commission’s encouragement that the sponsor honor the neighborhood agreement reached in recent discussions. The motion passed unanimously.
Staff and commissioners noted the practical effect: the Commission could not unilaterally impose more restrictive sign limits where the code allows the sign, but the endorsement of a negotiated agreement gives weight to neighborhood expectations. Final permits and sign dimensions will be determined by staff review consistent with code.
