Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Permit Dispute topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors appeal DBI sign‑off after contractor relocated stairs; board orders parties to negotiate
Summary
Homeowners at 478 Sixteenth Avenue appealed a DBI permit that retroactively covered relocated exterior stairs at 482 Sixteenth Avenue, citing privacy, security and unpermitted work; the Board continued the matter to permit the parties to attempt a negotiated solution.
Neighbors Edmund Lilly and Mary Parks appealed a building‑permit action that imperialized relocated exterior stairs adjacent to their backyard. The appellants said the stairs had been moved during construction without notification and that the new configuration intrudes on privacy, creates security concerns for a bathroom window and is unsightly. The permit holder’s representative said the work grew out of on‑site construction logistics, that the department ultimately required a permit, and that the stair design meets code requirements; DBI inspectors will verify code compliance and structural safety.
DBI and Planning representatives explained the procedural record: a 2012 building permit existed for rear‑yard work but the stairs shifted on site, which should have triggered an additional filing; once neighbors complained, DBI asked the contractor to file the corrected permit. DBI placed the permit in an inspection/suspension posture pending verification. Board members expressed clear concern about unpermitted work, the lack of neighbor notice during construction, and the fairness of retroactive sign‑off; one commissioner said the board could require the owner to move the stairs back but also encouraged a negotiated settlement. The board continued the case to September 14, 2016, to allow the parties to attempt resolution.
Why it matters: This case highlights how changes made in the field during renovation projects can materially affect neighboring properties and how the city addresses retrospective permitting and neighbor recourse.
Key factual clarifications: DBI confirmed there was a permit for the 2012 remodel but that the stairs were built in a different location without an amendment; DBI representatives said they will inspect and, if work deviates from approved plans or is unsafe, issue corrections or violations.
