Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Large Alteration Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board continues review of large alteration at 3808 First St after neighbors cite scale and historic concerns
Summary
Neighbors argued the DBI‑issued permit for 3808 First Street effectively doubles the home's size, adds decks and dormers that they say threaten privacy and historic character; the board continued the matter to May 18 to allow the permit holder to propose design modifications.
The San Francisco Board of Appeals on April 27 continued consideration of an alteration permit for 3808 First Street to May 18 after neighbors raised concerns that the project substantially expands the home and alters the block’s historic character.
Neighbors said the project would increase the house to roughly 3,500 square feet, add a roof deck and dormers, and could intrude on light, air and privacy. Victor Griffin, a neighbor, told the board the scope "doubles the size of the home" and noted the permit lists an estimated cost of $1,000,000 for the renovation. Appellants asked the board to refer the project to the Planning Department for full review rather than permitting it over the counter.
Permit‑holder counsel Tom Tunney said applicable Planning Code and Building Code requirements had been met and said the team had proposed revisions at a neighborhood pre‑application meeting; he said Planning issued a categorical exemption after environmental review. Planning staff Scott Sanchez said dormer windows and the proposed roof deck comport with longstanding zoning‑administrator interpretations that exempt certain rear dormers and decks from neighborhood notification and that the project did not trigger Section 317 demolition review. DBI reiterated structural notification was provided and reminded parties that start‑work inspections and special inspections would apply.
Multiple neighborhood speakers urged delay and additional review. Several commissioners expressed concerns about the dormer design and privacy impacts and moved to continue to allow the permit holder to return with possible redesigns; the motion to continue to May 18 carried (recorded vote).
