Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Board of Appeals rejects rehearing bids from wireless carriers amid Article 25 dispute
Summary
The San Francisco Board of Appeals on Nov. 4 denied multiple rehearing requests from Crown Castle/NextG permit holders who sought to overturn appeals that had revoked personal wireless facility permits over alleged defective notice under Article 25; Public Works said it will clarify notice rules in its departmental order.
The San Francisco Board of Appeals on Nov. 4 rejected rehearing requests from permit holders seeking to undo earlier revocations of personal wireless facility permits, largely over a dispute about how Article 25’s notice requirement applies to pole-mounted equipment.
Attorney Martin Feinman, representing the permit holder (identified in filings as Crown Castle NG West LLC), asked the board to grant rehearing in several appeals and argued that the code’s 150-foot noticing requirement applies to poles containing antennas, not to separate poles that support battery backup equipment. Feinman said applying a newly proposed…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
