Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Environmental Review topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Draft EIR for 801 Brannan / 1 Henry Adams released for public comment; staff identifies transportation, air-quality and PDR impacts

San Francisco Planning Commission · July 28, 2011
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Department opened the public comment period on the draft EIR for the 801 Brannan/1 Henry Adams project, a large mixed-use proposal that could deliver hundreds of housing units and substantial retail and parking; staff said the draft EIR finds significant unavoidable transportation and air-quality impacts and a contribution to PDR land-supply loss.

The Planning Department opened public comment on the draft environmental-impact report (EIR) for the 801 Brannan and 1 Henry Adams project at the July 28 Planning Commission hearing. The draft EIR describes a programmatic mixed-use redevelopment across two sites in Showplace Square, with variants that could yield several hundred dwelling units, tens of thousands of square feet of retail and a parking program that ranges by alternative. Staff emphasized that the draft EIR found significant and unavoidable impacts for transportation circulation and air quality and noted a cumulative contribution to PDR (production, distribution, repair) land-supply loss identified in the Eastern Neighborhoods EIR.

Public commenters raised concerns about adequacy of public notice and posting (one commenter said a missing sign was replaced within days but requested a comment-period extension), transit service levels near the site, and the project's proposed parking assumptions and contractual obligations claimed by sponsors. Planning staff said they had used the three standard public-notice methods (newspaper publication, direct mail and posted signs) and that missing signs were replaced within days after being reported; the comment period was left open through August 8 as published.

Commissioners and public-affairs stakeholders said the site represents a major redevelopment opportunity for housing and for the Mayor's Office of Housing to secure land for affordable units; they urged detailed transit and parking analyses in the comments and encouraged robust review during the remainder of the public-comment period.