Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Urban Forestry topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board upholds DPW denial of tree-removal permit at 201 Spear Street
Summary
Property owner appealed to remove 10 street trees near 201 Spear Street citing structural risk and liability; DPW said inspectors found no evidence of significant planter or vault failure and urged retention; the board voted 5-0 to uphold DPW's denial after extensive public opposition.
The Board of Appeals upheld the Department of Public Works' denial of a request to remove 10 privately maintained street trees at 201 Spear Street, voting 5-0 to support DPW's determination.
Property representatives argued the trees, planted over garage vaults, have restricted root space, girdling and cracking that pose a risk to pedestrians and cars and liability to the owner. Appellants proposed a streetscape plan that would remove the existing trees and install 19 replacements — six street trees at the curb and 13 olive trees in planters nearer the building — to reduce risk while enhancing the streetscape.
Carla Short of DPW Urban Forestry said staff found minimal evidence of actual planter or vault failure on a site visit and recommended retaining the healthy mature trees unless there was clear imminent structural failure. "We have seen other cases ... where the vaults themselves show signs of cracking, water leaking, you see some visible sign of damage," Short said, but added the planters in this case showed only limited, localized effects and that girdling appeared minimal and reparable.
Dozens of neighborhood speakers told the board the trees provide mature canopy, air-quality and shade benefits and that removal would be premature and harmful to the neighborhood's urban forest. Speakers noted nearby childcare centers and the trees' environmental benefits; several said the proposed replacement of only six trees (rather than 10) had not been publicly posted.
After questioning experts and departments, the board found DPW's assessment persuasive and voted to uphold DPW's denial of the removal permit. Commissioners left the record open for standard follow-up actions; the denial remains in effect.
