Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board Upholds Retaining-Wall Permit After Neighbors Raise Drainage, Encroachment Concerns
Summary
A format over-the-counter permit to replace a retaining wall at 765 Mangels was upheld after neighbors raised longstanding water, drainage and alleged unpermitted construction concerns; the Board found DBIs review adequate and encouraged technical resolution among engineers and inspectors.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors appealed a DBI-issued permit to replace a retaining wall and address drainage at 765 Mangels Avenue, describing a long history of unpermitted excavation, slope drainage problems and property-line encroachment dating back to 2007. Neighbors presented survey results showing an encroachment and argued prior ad-hoc repairs had failed and that the proposed work risked destabilizing adjacent retained structures.
Permit-holder counsel and retained engineers presented a gabion (wire-cage) retaining-wall design, a peer review, and a hydrology assessment showing existing downspouts and tributary areas that must be routed properly; they also said a French-drain solution and additional engineering detail would address runoff. DBI staff reviewed the corrective permit in the context of an outstanding Notice of Violation and confirmed the application had been routed for code-enforcement review and plan-check; inspectors recommended continued inspection and technical resolution.
After technical testimony from structural and civil engineers and back-and-forth with the appellantstechnical consultant, the Board found the application and DBI review were sufficient to deny the appeal and approve the permit. Commissioners emphasized that DBI and the parties must continue working through outstanding technical design details and that inspectors will verify corrections during field inspections. The motion to deny the appeal and approve the permit carried 4-0.
The item was heard as Item 11 on April 29. The Board noted the importance of collaboration among engineers, inspectors and neighbors where 0-lot-line retaining systems and drainage interdependencies exist.
