Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors press commission on proposed conversion of Valencia Garage; review continued to May 19
Summary
Dozens of residents and neighborhood groups urged the Planning Commission to preserve the Valencia Garage (1945 Hyde) as public parking, citing impacts on local businesses, seniors and transit‑poor Russian Hill; the commission continued the discretionary review and variance to May 19 and asked the sponsor to work with an adjacent neighbor on design adjustments.
Staff described a proposal to adaptively reuse the historic Valencia parking garage at 1945 Hyde Street into a three‑story over basement residential project with seven units, 14 parking spaces (stackers) and a ground‑floor commercial space. The department recommended approval of the conversion and the requested variance as the proposal responds to historic concerns but requires a rear‑yard variance for the third‑floor addition.
Public testimony was extensive and strongly divided. Neighborhood groups and numerous residents — including the Russian Hill Neighbors, Russian Hill Community Association and merchants — urged discretionary review and opposed conversion, arguing the garage is a unique neighborhood parking asset used by residents, visitors, seniors and restaurants and warning of domino effects if neighborhood parking is lost. Preservation and architectural witnesses described the garage's historic character and argued conversion would erode a network of community parking facilities.
Supporters — including small business owners, some local residents and housing advocates — argued the garage is underused for monthly parking, that the structure has been functionally obsolete and that adaptive reuse to housing would create jobs and increased tax revenue. The project sponsor said monthly use had averaged about 20 of 58 spaces recently and that the project would retain 14 spaces and provide public benefits.
After lengthy debate about parking utilization, transit conditions in Russian Hill, and architectural impacts (including a disputed third‑floor addition and light‑well/window impacts to an adjacent property), the commission unanimously continued the discretionary review and the variance to May 19, 2011, keeping public hearings open and directing the sponsor to work with the adjacent neighbor to resolve design issues.
