Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

At a glance: Board of Appeals votes, Jan. 21, 2015

San Francisco Board of Appeals · January 21, 2015
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Summary of formal board actions from the Jan. 21 meeting: adoption of Jan. 14 minutes; three temporary occupancy permits upheld with DPW date-reset condition; continuances for two appeals (Feb. 11 and March 25); and one permit upheld at 3300 Clay Street. Vote counts recorded where given.

The San Francisco Board of Appeals recorded the following formal actions on Jan. 21, 2015:

- Adoption of minutes (Jan. 14, 2015): Motion to adopt carried 4-0. (SEG 102–114)

- Appeals 14182–14184 (Park Merced / Arborwell temporary occupancy permits): Board upheld all three permits on the basis of code compliance and instructed DPW to reset the permit dates; vote 4-0. Condition recorded. (SEG 731–746)

- Appeal 14-176 (731 Commercial St., Charity Cultural Services Center): Continued to March 25, 2015 to allow DBI to complete inspections and for parties to prepare (motion by Commissioner Fung); vote 4-0. (SEG 882–893)

- Appeal 14-185 (3300 Clay St., Reginald Henley): DBI recommended the permit was properly issued; board upheld permit on basis it was code‑compliant and issued properly; vote 4-0. (SEG 1798–1811)

- Appeal 14-148 (4121 20th Street, Tom Goddard v. DBI): Continued to Feb. 11, 2015 with direction that DBI examine life‑safety issues and may allow limited work to address those issues under the suspended permit or issue an emergency permit; vote 4-0. (SEG 2260–2269)

All vote tallies were recorded on the record when votes were taken. Where board directed follow-up (for example, DPW resetting permit dates or DBI expediting shoring inspections), departments were assigned responsibility to report back as appropriate.