Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Element topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission initiates update of city housing element after wide public debate

San Francisco Planning Commission · February 24, 2011
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hours of public testimony on affordability, demolition protections and parking, the Planning Commission voted to initiate the City's housing element update process and move toward the staff-proposed March 24 adoption timeline while acknowledging calls for additional review time and stronger demolitions and anti-displacement language.

The Planning Commission on Feb. 24 moved to initiate the City's housing element update (draft 3). The evening'long discussion drew scores of public speakers and neighborhood groups pressing for stronger demolition limits, clearer definitions for "transit-rich" areas, tighter controls on parking, more on-site affordable housing and binding anti-displacement measures.

Staff described the changes between draft 2 and draft 3, saying the latest version clarifies community-based planning language, emphasizes the city's preference for housing near transit corridors, and adds implementation measures for project-level monitoring and reporting. Staff recommended a March 24 adoption hearing and warned that an adopted housing element is required for eligibility for many state funding programs administered by HCD and related grant opportunities.

Many neighborhood groups and advocates sought more time and revisions. Some asked the commission to extend the DEIR comment period (a request for 90 days was explicitly made) and to add firmer prohibitions on demolition of sound, rent-controlled housing unless a clear net increase of permanent affordable housing would result. Affordable-housing advocates also warned that current market trends and a large funding gap mean the city must prioritize mechanisms to produce and preserve below-market housing and to guard against displacement in communities of concern.

Commissioners debated the trade-offs: several emphasized the element is a policy document, not planning code, and that zoning or code changes remain separate. Staff and the mayor's housing office cautioned that federal and state funding windows are tied to having a valid, adopted housing element; staff said San Francisco is currently listed by HCD as out of compliance, which limits grant eligibility.

Commissioner Miguel moved to initiate the update and set the process toward adoption; the motion carried. Commissioners and staff stressed they would continue outreach and respond to outstanding comments as they proceed to the Board of Supervisors and the schedule for the EIR and adoption.