Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Atm 601 Clayton topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves conditional use for ATM at Haight/Clayton, 4–2 vote amid design concerns

San Francisco Planning Commission · July 22, 2010
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After staff recommended approval, the commission approved a conditional use permitting a 24/7 walk‑up ATM at 601 Clayton Street; supporters cited sidewalk width and historic‑façade constraints, while dissenting commissioners raised concerns about aesthetics and commercial signage creeping into pedestrian character.

The Planning Commission approved a conditional use authorization on July 22 allowing a walk‑up, nonbank ATM at 601 Clayton Street (case 2010.0183C) despite concerns about its location on a historic building’s facade.

Planning staff described the proposed machine as 1 foot 8 inches wide and 2 feet 8 inches tall, to be located 2 feet 5 inches above the sidewalk and operating 24 hours a day. Staff noted that a prior unpermitted ATM had been installed for about a decade and later removed following enforcement. The department’s preliminary recommendation was to approve the conditional use with conditions.

On behalf of the applicant, a representative said Clayton is a wider, secondary thoroughfare (15 feet of sidewalk) than Haight Street and that a 3‑foot setback required by ordinance would unduly alter the historic facade and be structurally difficult and costly, potentially requiring new foundations and extensive interior repair costing “in excess of $20,000‑$30,000.” The sponsor argued the proposed installation would restore a longtime neighborhood service.

Commissioners debated aesthetics and pedestrian character. Commissioner Moore said recessed ATMs better preserve corner storefront expression and reduce the risk of ATMs becoming oversized advertising panels; he opposed the proposal on those grounds. Other commissioners, noting limited bank access in the area and the previous high use of an unpermitted ATM, supported approval. The motion carried 4–2 with Commissioners Moore and Seguin voting no.

Outcome: conditional use authorization granted to allow the ATM without the 3‑foot setback; staff will finalize permit conditions.