Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
San Francisco Board of Appeals upholds multiple enforcement actions, splits a food-cart revocation
Summary
On June 5, 2013 the San Francisco Board of Appeals voted on several enforcement matters: it rescheduled one variance hearing, denied a rehearing request over a rooftop-deck dispute, upheld revocation of a mobile-food permit at Sixteenth Street while reinstating the permit for New Montgomery, reduced two ATM-related penalties, and upheld a notice of violation for an alleged residential commercial use at 264 Dolores Street.
SAN FRANCISCO — The San Francisco Board of Appeals on June 5, 2013 issued a string of final decisions on zoning, building and public-works appeals, including a split ruling on a contested mobile-food permit and an upheld zoning violation for a residential property.
The board voted unanimously to reschedule a variance hearing for 639 Peralta Avenue to July 10 after the appellant said she had received critical response materials too late to prepare. Commissioners also denied a rehearing request in Shipkowitz v. Zoning Administrator (349 Bank Street), finding that most material in the rehearing filing repeated issues already considered and did not meet the threshold for rehearing. Appellant Vicky Shipkowitz had argued the deck in question was “unprecedented” and a potential fire hazard; the board concluded there was not sufficient new evidence to reopen the case.
In a contested enforcement matter involving a mobile food vendor…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
