Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Building Permit Uphold topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board upholds permit for 721 Beach Street, rejecting neighbors’ appeal

San Francisco Board of Appeals · April 10, 2013
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board of Appeals denied a neighborhood appeal and upheld the planning commission and Building Inspection approvals for a 3‑story, mixed‑use project at 721 Beach Street by a 4‑0 vote; neighbors had raised light, air and precedent concerns.

The San Francisco Board of Appeals voted 4‑0 on April 10 to uphold a permit allowing a three‑story, two‑unit building with ground‑floor retail at 721 Beach Street, rejecting neighborhood objections that the project would block light and not fit the block face.

Neighbor Greg Holzman and other residents argued the project reads as a four‑story structure from parts of the street and claimed substantial shadow and parking impacts. "There's really just a few of us here today...we're tired of protesting this development," Holzman said, summarizing neighborhood opposition.

Project counsel John Kevlin and sponsors Jeff and Elena Sears described extensive outreach and design changes made in response to concerns, including a lowered bulk profile, internal connections to reduce sidewalk clutter, and concessions to neighboring properties. "We deliberately included many of those same neighbors' concerns and issues when designing our project," Jeff Sears said, emphasizing outreach and concessions.

Planning Department staff noted the property is in a C‑2 community business district and that the project complies with planning code and the design review process; the Planning Commission had unanimously approved the permit. After commissioners discussed outreach and contextual scale, the board moved to deny the appeal and uphold the permit on the basis that the permit is code‑compliant and the project responded to neighborhood input. The motion passed 4‑0.

With the appeal denied, the permit remains in effect and further building‑permit processing may continue under standard procedures.