Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Starbelly Permit topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission allows outdoor seating for Starbelly, tightens conditions on noise, trash and hours

San Francisco Planning Commission · November 19, 2009
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After contentious public comment from neighbors citing noise, fire and trash concerns, the commission approved amendments for Starbelly (3583 Sixteenth St.) to allow limited outdoor seating and extended indoor hours with conditions including rooftop sound attenuation, outdoor hours ending at 9 p.m., indoor trash storage and follow‑ups by health and fire departments.

The Planning Commission voted to approve modifications to Starbelly’s conditional use permit with a set of operational conditions aimed at reducing neighborhood impacts.

Staff introduced the case (2009.0861C) and said the applicant sought extended indoor hours to midnight on Fridays and Saturdays and 11 p.m. on other nights, outdoor seating until 9 p.m., and permission for a cleaning crew to be on site until 4 a.m.; staff noted more than 100 letters of support and several complaints from adjacent neighbors about noise and refuse. "The department feels the proposed use is necessary and desirable and recommends approval of the project with conditions," staff stated.

Architect Jim Zack and the restaurant’s partners (Deborah Blum, Adriano Paganini and Eddie Sarti) described the property history and said they had invested in renovations, reporting that clients had spent about $4,050,000 on patio improvements. The applicants proposed mitigation such as new refuse enclosures, soundwalls and relocating or replacing rooftop mechanical equipment to reduce noise.

Neighbors sharply disputed the applicants’ timeline and safety practices. Longtime neighbor Ron Lanza said the backyard has been used in violation of an earlier permit and raised fire‑safety and rodent issues, calling some of the project team’s statements “disingenuous.” Other neighbors described repeated late‑night noise, bottles and trash and urged denial or strict conditions. Supporters testified the restaurant had become a neighborhood asset and that outdoor seating was desirable for the community.

Commission discussion focused on enforceable mitigations: rooftop sound attenuation for hoods and exhaust, clarifying condition 13 so outdoor seating ends at 9 p.m., relocation of trash storage inside the building or into a secure enclosure, limiting staff access to the rear stairway after 10 p.m., and routing inspections or permits through the Department of Public Health and Fire Department for rodent control and egress/exit compliance. Commissioner Seguaya noted the 9 p.m. limit for outdoor seating would mean patrons must be cleared by that time.

On the motion to approve with the architect’s suggested modifications and corrected condition 13, the commission voted unanimously in favor. The approval included direction that fire and health departments must clear outstanding safety and storage issues before any permit revision is finalized.

The commission’s action balanced neighborhood concerns about noise, trash and safety with the applicants’ contention that patio operations were important to the restaurant’s viability. The condition changes and referrals to health and fire departments were intended to address safety and public‑health risks raised in testimony.