Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 1415 Mission Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission certifies EIR and approves entitlements for 1415 Mission Street with conditions; 6–1 vote on entitlements
Summary
The Planning Commission certified the final EIR for 1415 Mission Street after debate over wind and height, then approved the project’s CEQA findings, conditional use and zoning map amendment with direction on transition measures and a green wall; EIR certification passed 4–3; entitlements passed 6–1.
The San Francisco Planning Commission on Tuesday moved forward with one of the largest recent private‑sector housing proposals for the Mid‑Mission corridor, certifying the final environmental impact report for 1415 Mission Street and approving the project’s key land‑use entitlements with conditions and design directions for the sponsor.
Irene Nishimura of the Planning Department introduced certification of the Final EIR for the proposed mixed‑use development at 1415 Mission Street, a 14‑story, approximately 130‑foot building with 117 residential units and ground‑floor retail. Staff noted the Final EIR included wind studies that drew public scrutiny. During the hearing, neighbors and community groups raised concerns about wind, height, view transition and neighborhood compatibility; labor unions and housing advocates emphasized the project’s housing (including 18 on‑site below‑market units) and job creation benefits.
Commissioner Will Lee moved to certify the Final EIR with a narrowly framed modification; after debate about the wind analysis and view/transition issues, the EIR certification motion passed 4–3. After design presentations by project sponsor representatives (Jim Rubin and architect Clark Manas) and a prolonged public comment period with dozens of speakers on both sides, the commission considered the project entitlements: CEQA findings/Section 309 determination, conditional‑use authorization for dwelling‑unit exemptions, and a zoning map amendment to C3G.
The commission voted to approve those entitlements and related findings, urging the planning department to explore possible rezoning to create a transition on adjacent parcels and directing the sponsor to continue design work on a south‑facing “notch” and to investigate greening the blank south wall. The motion passed 6–1 with Commissioner Olague dissenting.
Key facts the commission recorded on the record: the project proposes 117 dwelling units (including 18 below‑market units on site), roughly 44 percent two‑bedroom units intended to support families, and parking below grade with up to 46 independently accessible spaces (or up to 101 valet). Commission conditions emphasize further work on transition to the lower‑rise blocks to the south, continued refinement of wind‑mitigation measures, and exploration of a living green wall on the south elevation.
The Zoning Administrator separately granted the project sponsor a dwelling‑unit exposure variance and noted that the decision is appealable; a decision letter will be mailed to registered parties.
The commission’s actions move the project forward through the entitlement stage; sponsor and staff will continue design refinement to address transition, wind and open‑space comments raised during the hearing.
