Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission presses staff on enforcing proposed rules for 'tobacco paraphernalia' shops on Polk Street

San Francisco Planning Commission · October 22, 2009
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff proposed narrowing the definition of tobacco-paraphernalia establishments and a temporary prohibition in Polk Street NCD; commissioners debated thresholds (0%–15%), enforcement practicality and requested police crime data and alternatives; item continued to Nov. 12.

Planning Department staff told the commission that legislation introduced by Supervisor David Chu would tighten the city’s definition of a “tobacco paraphernalia establishment” (a retail use that would trigger a conditional use requirement) by lowering the threshold to 10 percent of occupied floor area or 10 linear feet of display, and by placing a temporary prohibition in the Polk Street Neighborhood Commercial District.

Jamie Cantwell, an aide to Supervisor Chu, told commissioners that the office and neighborhood groups described a local concentration of head shops in a small area of Polk Street and that “with the rise in head shops has come an increase in crime, excessive loitering, prostitution, public intoxication, as well as litter and excessive traffic.” Planning staff and the Office of Economic and Workforce Development described enforcement difficulties and urged a clearer definition that would allow earlier identification of problematic shops.

Commissioners repeatedly raised enforcement questions: how would inspectors measure display area, how would the rule handle small incidental sales (a single decorative pipe), and whether a hard trigger (any paraphernalia at all) would unfairly penalize small businesses. Several commissioners urged staff to produce police statistics, demonstrate a causation link between concentrations of these shops and public‑safety incidents, and evaluate alternative regulatory tools such as numeric caps per block or a moratorium.

Staff said they support the legislation’s intent but acknowledged practical hurdles and enforcement tradeoffs; they also said the city has an interim moratorium in place on Lower Polk and would seek an extension from the supervisor’s office to give staff time to draft alternatives. The commission voted to continue the item to November 12 and asked staff to return with additional analysis and possible regulatory options.