Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Affordability topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board amendments to Eastern Neighborhoods spark hour‑long public debate and mixed staff recommendations

San Francisco Planning Commission · November 13, 2008
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission heard Supervisor‑introduced amendments to the Eastern Neighborhoods plan (affordable housing tiers, PDR replacement fee, Potrero Center and SoMa youth/family zoning). Staff recommended mostly against the most aggressive affordability increases while offering alternative incentive packages; the hearing produced a wide public split between housing advocates and business/property groups.

The Planning Commission held a lengthy public hearing on four pieces of trailing legislation affecting the Eastern Neighborhoods plan: Mission District housing/PDR replacement requirements; a SoMa Youth & Family Zone special‑use district; rezoning and special‑use treatment for the Potrero Center; and rezones of several public parcels. Staff presented a financial 'value capture' analysis and alternatives proposed by the Mayor’s Office of Housing.

Key points: supporters including SPUR and the Housing Action Coalition warned the Supervisor‑sponsored amendments (which would raise on‑site inclusionary percentages and lower income limits for rental units) would exceed what the feasibility analysis shows is supportable and could suppress development. Project proponents and neighborhood advocates (SOMCAN, MAC) urged more aggressive land‑dedication options and unit‑mix rules to deliver family‑sized and deeply affordable housing. The Mayor’s Office outlined a set of compromises: modest adjustments to inclusionary requirements for rental projects that commit to long‑term covenants, incentives to encourage land dedication and a pilot acquisition program funded by a portion of fees to stabilize housing in priority neighborhoods.

Outcome: staff recommendations were recorded and the commission voted to send its positions back to the Land Use Committee for final action; several amendments will be handled at the Board in the coming weeks. Planning staff emphasized monitoring feasibility and proposing targeted incentives rather than immediate across‑the‑board affordability hikes.