Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board upholds DBI permit for replacement windows at 2510 Bridal Street
Summary
Neighbors appealed a DBI permit to replace and modernize side‑facing windows at 2510 Bridal Street, alleging the alteration violated required fire separation and privacy rules on a narrow property line. DBI and the permit holders said the work was repair/maintenance and the new dual‑pane, obscure glass improved privacy and noise control. The board upheld the permit 5–0.
Neighbors Maria and Eric Tam appealed a July DBI permit authorizing replacement windows at 2510 Bridal Street, saying the enlarged/operable window encroached on the property line and could violate California Building Code separation rules and create a fire hazard. The permit holders, Richard Dallara and Naomi Shellen, acknowledged they began work without a permit, stopped after notice of violation, paid penalties and then obtained the required permit; they said the new windows are dual‑pane and obscure‑glazed and are the same or slightly smaller than the previous openings.
DBI and Planning staff supported the view that the work qualified as maintenance/repair where openings were not enlarged in a way that triggers full new‑construction code requirements; DBI noted its policy permitting maintenance of nonconforming conditions when openings are not increased. Commissioner discussion emphasized the older building stock, the safety role of DBI inspections and the practical benefits of dual‑pane, obscure glazing for both privacy and noise reduction.
The board voted 5–0 to deny the appeal and uphold the permit. Commissioners encouraged neighbors and the permit holders to maintain open communication; DBI will enforce any code compliance issues if they arise.
What’s next: The permit stands; DBI retains authority to inspect and to require corrective work if a later inspection shows noncompliance.
