Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Institutional Master Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission disapproves conditional-use application for 1727 Lombard (Star Motel) amid enforcement dispute with Academy of Art

San Francisco Planning Commission · August 8, 2008
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extensive public testimony and debate over the Academy of Art's institutional master plan and past enforcement notices, the commission voted unanimously to disapprove the Academy's conditional-use application for the Star Motel at 1727 Lombard Street.

The Planning Commission on Aug. 7 disapproved the Academy of Art University's conditional-use application for the Star Motel at 1727 Lombard Street, following extended public testimony that ranged from neighborhood support for recent site improvements to sharp criticism about the Academy's broader pattern of acquiring properties without conditional uses or a completed institutional master plan.

Staff recommended continuance pending completion of the environmental review for the Academy's institutional master plan and noted the institution had submitted multiple conditional-use applications. Academy representatives asked for a continuance to finish outreach and environmental/traffic review; they also said they have paid much of the cost for the environmental review process. Opponents — including neighborhood advocates (Sue Hester), the Coalition for San Francisco Land Use and Housing, and other speakers — urged denial, citing alleged long-standing violations and arguing that approval would reward noncompliance. Supporters including the Northern Station police officer and some merchants said the site's security and crime indicators have improved.

Commissioners expressed frustration at the institution's history, enforcement process, and the length of time needed to complete the institutional master plan and EIR. After debate, the commission voted to disapprove the conditional-use application for the rear portion of the property; the disapproval prevents the applicant from filing a substantially similar request for one year unless the environmental review and IMP process are complete. The vote was recorded as unanimous.