Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Market Octavia topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission backs Board of Supervisors’ Market Octavia amendments, sends recommendation

San Francisco Planning Commission · March 27, 2008
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended public comment and deliberation, the Planning Commission supported Board‑sponsored amendments to the Market Octavia plan (vote 4–1), endorsing a tiered affordable‑housing fee and parking changes while preserving some original commission protections.

The Planning Commission reviewed amendments the Board of Supervisors added to the Market Octavia plan and took public testimony from neighbors, advocacy groups and city staff. Anne Marie Rogers of the Planning Department summarized the changes the board advanced and why they were returned to the Commission for review.

Key changes passed along to the Commission: a tiered affordable‑housing fee instead of a single citywide $10/sq. ft. levy (board proposals ranged roughly $8/sq. ft. in the Special Use District, $4/sq. ft. in neighborhood commercial transit districts and no additional fee in some RTO areas), refinements to parking ratios and a $30/sq. ft. in‑lieu option tied to historic‑resource TDRs in specific higher‑density areas. Staff told the Commission these changes were intended to protect small builders while still generating funds for affordable housing.

Commissioners weighed tradeoffs between density controls and neighborhood impacts. Supporters including SPUR and Livable City argued the tiered approach and the other guardrails will better balance housing production and affordability. Opposition and neighborhood commenters pushed back on notice, CEQA coverage and citywide implications.

On the motion to convey the Board’s amendments with comment, the Commission voted 4–1 to support the changes and to forward the recommendation to the Board of Supervisors.

Why it matters: Market Octavia is one of the city’s large neighborhood plans and changes to fees, parking and RTO rules will influence how development proceeds in parts of the city’s mid‑Market/Octavia corridor and inform upcoming Eastern Neighborhoods rezonings.

What's next: The amendments will proceed with the Board of Supervisors; the Commission asked staff to return with clarifications as the Board finalizes legislation.