Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Records Retention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissions weigh requiring 3‑11 notices and key documents be included in permanent permit records
Summary
Staff and community members urged codifying minimum plan submittal items so 3‑11 notices, conditions of approval and other attachments are preserved in microfilm/electronic records to aid enforcement and transparency.
Planning and building staff and neighborhood representatives discussed requiring a minimum set of permit submittal materials so key documents — including the 3‑11 notice sent to neighbors, Board/CU conditions, and historic resource attachments — become part of the permanent permit record.
Field inspectors reported difficulty locating original 3‑11 notices and discretionary conditions years after permit issuance; that hampers on‑the‑ground verification when neighbors complain that construction differs from what was originally noticed. DBI staff proposed adding the 3‑11 notice to the permit plan set or, alternately, capturing it in an improved electronic permitting system tied to parcels and GIS.
Several neighborhood advocates supported codifying attachments and retention policies. Bruce Bonicker said attaching notices and Board decisions to plan sets would make enforcement easier; Sue Hester and others recommended a consistent written checklist so architects and applicants supply uniform content. Commissioner Satori and DBI staff cautioned that 3‑11 notifications often change during review and recommended electronic record‑keeping that preserves revision history and a clear set of final record documents.
Staff and commissioners suggested a pragmatic next step: adopt a checklist of minimum submittal items and pilot the approach for projects that commonly generate neighborhood disputes, with longer‑term migration to a fully integrated electronic/GIS‑based permitting system.
