Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Continuances topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission continues five items after public pleas on Bayview rezoning and CPMC appeals
Summary
The San Francisco Planning Commission on April 12 agreed to continue five calendar items — including a conditional-use and negative-declaration appeal tied to CPMC’s DeBose project — after residents urged more time for review and written responses. Commissioners separated item 6 (1029 Natoma) for later scheduling to allow staff and parties to seek resolution.
SAN FRANCISCO — The Planning Commission on April 12 moved to continue five calendar items to allow more time for staff reports and community input, in response to extensive public comment about neighborhood impacts and environmental review.
The continuances covered a set of proposals on the commission calendar, including appeals tied to the California Pacific Medical Center (CPMC) DeBose project and other permit matters. Public commenters from Bayview Hunters Point emphasized the need for fuller community participation and environmental review. ‘‘We worked very hard to get a 33,200 signatures,’’ said Francisco de Costa, who described court involvement and urged commissioners to ‘‘do our homework’’ before rezoning parts of Bayview Hunters Point.
Espanola Jackson, a neighborhood resident, asked the commission to require a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in the Southeast sector before rezoning, citing landfill and soil concerns and the risk to homes and businesses. Neighbors affiliated with a community task force said they are close to agreement with project sponsors in some cases but requested more time to receive written responses and finalize neighborhood agreements.
Commissioner Michael Antonini proposed removing item 6 (1029 Natoma) from the blanket continuation and continuing items 1–5 as proposed on the calendar. After debate and an initial tied vote on an earlier motion to continue all six items, the commission approved the amended motion to continue items 1–5, with item 6 rescheduled for separate consideration. Commissioners recorded their votes on the record.
Why it matters: Several of the continued items involve major neighborhood projects and appeals — including conditional-use and environmental-review disputes — that neighbors say require additional technical review, written responses, and time to negotiate mitigation before a final hearing. Staff told commissioners they need time to craft complete responses to appeals and to coordinate with environmental consultants.
What’s next: The commission set item 6, 1029 Natoma Street, for follow-up and continued the other five items as publicly announced; some parties asked for one additional week on specific files because counsel will be unavailable. The continuances aim to give staff and community groups space to resolve outstanding issues before merits hearings.
