Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Residential Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves four‑unit project at 1029 Natoma Street; zoning variance granted

Planning Commission · June 14, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a four‑unit residential development at 1029 Natoma Street and the zoning administrator granted a parking variance to allow tandem parking and one fewer off‑street space, citing neighborhood concerns and transit access.

The Planning Commission unanimously approved a proposal to demolish a fire‑damaged dwelling and construct a four‑story, four‑unit residential building at 1029 Natoma Street, and the zoning administrator granted a parking variance allowing tandem parking and the elimination of one required off‑street parking space.

Tim Frey, the department’s preservation technical specialist, explained that the existing building was not identified as a historic resource and the revised project reduced height and provided a grade‑level rear yard. Project sponsor Stanley Seidovitz presented design features including a long light well to bring natural light into units and a rear garden. The sponsor told commissioners the existing structure was severely damaged by fire and termite infestation and largely unrepairable.

The Western SoMa Task Force initially opposed the project but, after revisions, acknowledged improvements including reduced height and compliance with Cap Alley guidelines. Neighbors who had opposed the earlier version expressed support for the revisions. Commissioner comments addressed unit mix, potential conversion of units to two‑bedrooms, and parking impact.

The commission approved the conditional use with conditions as drafted. The zoning administrator closed the public hearing on the variance and granted it on the basis that the project's changes responded to neighborhood concerns and the site is well served by transit, making the variance appropriate.

The project sponsor will proceed with final permit steps subject to conditions recorded in the project file and the granted variance.