Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medical Cannabis topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves two medical cannabis collectives amid safety and clustering debate
Summary
The commission approved legalization for BASA Collective at 1326 Grove and Valencia Street Caregivers at 208 Valencia, citing staff findings that both met code criteria; commissioners and neighbors debated safety, proximity to schools, and the concentration of dispensaries in some neighborhoods.
The San Francisco Planning Commission approved two mandatory discretionary-review applications on March 8 to legalize existing medical cannabis collectives, after public testimony that ranged from emphatic patient endorsements to neighborhood safety concerns.
Staff recommended approval for BASA Collective (1326 Grove) and Valencia Street Caregivers (208 Valencia), finding each met applicable planning criteria and local operational rules (including restrictions on on-site smoking). Planning staff described the Grove site as an MC2-zoned operation occupying a former smoke-shop retail space and said it was not within 1,000 feet of an elementary or secondary school under the department’s measurement for the site.
At the Grove Street hearing, the project sponsor said BASA serves roughly 15–20 patients a day and operates 16 cameras on site. Supporters, including patients and representatives of patient organizations, described the collectives as compassionate neighborhood resources; opponents raised concerns about criminal activity around the Grove & Divisidero intersection and about the clustering of dispensaries in the area. Resident Lisa Zauner told the commission: “I witnessed a drug deal in broad daylight from a woman coming out of the Bassa Collective,” citing repeated incidents recorded on local crime maps.
Tariq Alazri (project operator) and other sponsors said collectives work with police and maintain surveillance; Alazri said the dispensary provides escorts and records and “we do our best” to be good neighbors. Commissioners discussed the statutory grandfathering rules for sites in operation before the April 1, 2005 cutoff and whether the city should adopt a numerical cap on dispensaries; staff said the Board of Supervisors chose not to include an anti-clustering limit when it adopted the local regulations.
On Grove (item 13), the commission’s motion to not take discretionary review and approve the project passed 5–2, with Commissioners Alexander and Antonini recorded voting No. On Valencia (item 14), the commission similarly approved the project as proposed; Commissioner Alexander had stepped out of the room for that vote.
Next steps: staff will continue processing permits and oversight under the adopted local regulations; commissioners discussed follow-up checks and suggested the commission or staff could require neighborhood reports in the future to track impacts.
