Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Board of Appeals Upholds Planning Commission on Crescent Heights Project After Hours of Debate on Parking and Wind Studies
Summary
After hours of testimony and public comment, the San Francisco Board of Appeals on a 3–2 vote upheld the Planning Commission—s findings and variances for the Crescent Heights proposal at Tenth and Market, rejecting appeals that challenged added parking and environmental analysis of pedestrian‑level wind.
The San Francisco Board of Appeals on Tuesday upheld the Planning Commission—s approval of exceptions and variances for the Crescent Heights mixed‑use project at Tenth and Market Street, rejecting appeals that argued the project would worsen parking shortages and produce hazardous winds at the pedestrian level.
The appeals, filed by neighborhood groups and preservation advocates, centered on two issues: the Planning Commission—s decision to allow discretionary parking above the as‑of‑right amount and whether the environmental review adequately addressed wind and habitability impacts for new units. Appellants urged the board to overturn the commission—s actions, saying the extra parking would encourage more vehicle trips and that the wind analyses were inconsistent.
Tom Radulovich, a BART board member and executive director of Livable City, argued the…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
