Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homeless Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors and seniors urge scrutiny of proposed St. Boniface shelter at 366 Clementina
Summary
Dozens of neighbors and managers told the Planning Commission that a proposed 105‑bed men’s shelter at 366 Clementina Street would conflict with nearby senior housing, playgrounds and a former preschool and asked for fuller discretionary review and notice; staff advised block-book notation and discretionary review options.
Get email alerts on the Homeless Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Scores of neighbors and building managers addressed the Planning Commission on Nov. 3 to oppose a proposal for a 105‑bed men’s shelter at 366 Clementina Street, saying the site sits adjacent to dense senior housing and family amenities and that the city should give the change‑of‑use closer scrutiny.
Lisa Hanson, speaking for a neighborhood coalition, said the site is “next door to many hundreds of senior citizens and disabled persons” and described nearby children’s facilities and playgrounds. “Does a homeless shelter belong so close to where children play?” she asked.
Multiple speakers said the property formerly housed a children’s preschool that served underserved families for 35 years and argued the neighborhood had lost a valued community service. Building managers and apartment staff reported dozens of elderly residents in nearby buildings and a roster of concerns including lighting, egress, deliveries and potential increases in street activity.
Staff and commissioners explained procedural options to speakers: block‑book notation on the permit will trigger mailed notice and a 10‑day window to file a discretionary review (Doctor) if residents want the commission to hear the matter when a permit is filed. Staff also noted that in some zoning districts a change of use can be permitted “as of right” and thus may not require the same public notice unless neighbors file for discretionary review.
Neighbors urged the commission to consider requiring discretionary review or other safeguards because the proposal would be in a dense residential zone with many seniors and children. Commissioners and staff encouraged residents to register for notice so they will receive formal opportunity to appeal or request review when the permit application arrives.
