Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Residential Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Third‑floor addition at 2462 20th Ave approved after divided debate over neighborhood character
Summary
Neighbors argued a proposed three‑story addition would be out of scale on an RH‑1 block and reduce mid‑block open space; the commission debated residential design guideline setbacks and ultimately failed a motion to take discretionary review with a 15‑foot setback, after which the project was approved as proposed with a notice of special restriction added by staff.
Get email alerts on the Residential Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A contentious hearing over a three‑story vertical addition at 2462 20th Avenue produced prolonged debate about street character, mid‑block open space and precedent for future additions.
Neighbors including Perry Chia and Karen Mitchell argued the proposed third floor is incompatible with the prevailing two‑story rhythm on the block, saying the addition extends deeper and higher than adjacent houses and would affect mid‑block open space. The project sponsor and supporters said outreach had taken place and maintained the plans comply with existing zoning and setback standards; supporters highlighted nearby taller buildings.
Staff briefed commissioners on the residential design guidelines, noting the guidelines typically allow an additional floor only when it is set back substantially (often 15 feet) so the street face remains compatible. Commissioners debated whether 13 feet (the sponsor's proposed setback) was adequate versus the 15‑foot standard or a stronger rear setback. Some commissioners asked for three‑dimensional simulations to visualize streetscape impact; others urged adherence to guidelines allowing a modest third floor set back from the facade.
A motion to take discretionary review, require a 15‑foot minimum setback and add a notice of special restriction failed 3–2 (Commissioners Moore and O'Malley voting no). In the absence of a successful motion to require modifications or continuation, the commission approved the project as proposed. Staff said it would place a notice of special restriction on the permit to flag potential conversion concerns and to put future buyers on notice.
