Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Board of Appeals decisions, March 14
Summary
The Board of Appeals recorded several motions: multiple continuances, upholds of three permits, and one appeal denial. Key results include continuances of Items 5a/5b and 8, and affirmative votes to uphold Taxi Commission, Item 6 (firewall), Item 9 (with July 21 stay), and Item 11 (nail-salon permit).
Key outcomes from the March 14 meeting of the San Francisco Board of Appeals:
- Items 5a & 5b (CEQA appeals concerning 869 Northpointe) — continued one week to March 21 (motion passed 5–0).
- Item 8 (Kramer v. DBI; Guerrero Street; rescheduling tied to pending Board of Supervisors moratorium discussion) — continued to April 18 (motion passed 5–0).
- Item 10 (Quan v. zoning administrator; rescheduled at appellant request) — continued one week to March 21 (motion passed 5–0).
- Item 4 (Cyril Matarazzo appeal of Taxi Commission removal) — motion to uphold the Taxi Commission carried 4–1; appeal denied.
- Item 7 (Luigi’s Delicatessa conditional-use discussion) — continued to the call of the chair to allow parties to pursue a conditional-use route (motion passed 5–0).
- Item 6 (1018 Clayton firewall/spite-wall dispute) — permit to alter was upheld (vote recorded as 5–0 in transcript).
- Item 9 (1460 Broadway renovation) — permit upheld, but the board ordered no work commence until July 21 (vote 5–0) to accommodate tenants’ move-out under an Ellis Act eviction scheduled for July 20.
- Item 11 (2277 Chestnut nail-salon permit) — appeal denied and permit upheld 3–2; four votes would have been required to overturn the permit.
These actions were recorded in the board minutes and the relevant permit or appeal files. Parties seeking further action on policy issues (for example, neighborhood-use restrictions or planning-code amendments) were advised to work with the Planning Department or Board of Supervisors.
