Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Senior Care topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission upholds mitigated negative declaration and approves conditional uses with preconstruction protections for 2420 Sutter

San Francisco Planning Commission · August 10, 2006
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After an appeal by the adjacent Russian Center raising parking, construction-shoring and historic-resource concerns, the commission upheld the mitigated negative declaration for the Sunrise dementia-care facility and approved conditional uses with added conditions including a preconstruction existing-conditions report for the adjacent Russian Center.

The Planning Commission upheld a mitigated negative declaration for Sunrise Senior Development’s proposed 58‑unit residential care facility for frail and cognitively impaired elderly at 2420 Sutter Street and approved the companion conditional-use authorizations with additional conditions concerning preconstruction protections.

Appellants — the Russian Center and its counsel Jim Kaller — argued the project’s bulk (up to the 65‑foot zoning limit), added traffic and parking impacts for the center’s elderly patrons, potential structural risks from excavation and shoring adjacent to an historic building, and a brief historic‑resource analysis. The Russian Center asked for guarantees against construction impacts, coordination on shoring/monitoring, protections for emergency access, and attention to noise during events.

Project counsel and Sunrise representatives said the site is zoned for the proposed height, estimated project traffic impacts were minimal (about eight PM‑peak vehicle trips), and the project includes 44 parking spaces split between medical-office uses and the residential facility. Staff recommended approval with two modifications to conditions: (1) compliance with the city’s First Source hiring program and (2) enhanced final review of exterior materials and details. In response to neighbor concerns, the commission added a preconstruction existing‑conditions evaluation for the Russian Center by a mutually selected engineer with copies to DBI and Planning, and the motion approving the conditional uses passed unanimously.

Commissioners emphasized that excavation, shoring, construction-period impacts and traffic management fall under DBI, DPT and other agencies but insisted the preconstruction report be filed and available to neighbors and city agencies.