Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Results topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Board of Appeals decisions Dec. 6, 2006
Summary
A concise roundup of the Board’s formal outcomes on Dec. 6: retention of court‑reporter rule (5‑0); denial of a rehearing on clustered Bush/Taylor appeals (4‑1); continuances and permit upholds with conditions across multiple items.
The San Francisco Board of Appeals recorded the following formal outcomes on Dec. 6, 2006:
- Retain Article 4 (court reporter) — Motion carried 5‑0. Board will pursue contracting for a new court reporter rather than delete the reporter requirement.
- Deny rehearing (appeals affecting 734 Bush St., 625 Taylor St. and related cases) — Motion carried 4‑1. Commissioners found the rehearing standard (new evidence or manifest injustice) was not met; enforcement referrals were directed to DBI and DPH.
- Continue: Appeal re deck at 1767 30 Fourth Avenue — continued to 01/10/2007 (motion carried 5‑0) to allow submission of revised code‑conforming plans or variance application.
- Uphold permit: 460 Duncan Street (Bartonwerfer) — Motion carried 5‑0; board found the project consistent with residential design guidelines after neighbor negotiations.
- Uphold permit: 740–742 Natoma Street — Motion carried 5‑0 after staff shadow studies and planning review indicated no increased shadow impact beyond existing conditions.
- Uphold permit with conditions: 2719 Filbert Street — Motion carried 5‑0; six conditions were adopted (roof hatch and vent dimensions, plans on site, routing of revised plans, BBN and an NSR to notify neighbors).
- Continue: 2327 20th Avenue (tenant displacement appeal) — continued to 01/17/2007 (motion carried 5‑0) to permit negotiation and to allow the tenant additional time to seek housing.
These decisions will be implemented through staff routing to DBI/Planning for priority review, contract actions for transcription services, and recording or filing of notifications where the board required them.
