Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Planning Commission moves forward on several housing and commercial items
Summary
On March 2, 2023 the Planning Commission approved the Environmental Justice Framework and several land‑use items, including conditional use authorizations for 276 Grandview and 2050 Chestnut, approval of an accessory studio at 681 Twelfth and discretionary approvals for 1027–1029 Clayton (with a 2‑ft west deck modification).
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The San Francisco Planning Commission took votes on multiple agenda items during its March 2, 2023 meeting.
Key outcomes: • Environmental Justice Framework (General Plan amendment, Item 13): Approved unanimously 6–0; transmitted to the Board of Supervisors. Staff noted a new EJ communities map and a user guide for interagency use. (See separate coverage.)
• 276 Grandview Avenue (CUA, Item 14): Commission approved a conditional use authorization to demolish an existing single‑family dwelling and construct two attached units. Staff recommended approval with conditions; motion passed unanimously 6–0.
• 98 Pennsylvania Street (Large Project Authorization, Item 20): Approved 5–1 after extended debate. (See separate coverage for details.)
• 2050 Chestnut Street (CUA, pulled from consent): Planning staff found the proposed ground‑floor formula retail use (1,200‑sq‑ft jewelry store) complies with the formula‑retail threshold and recommended approval; commissioners approved with conditions 6–0.
• 681 Twelfth Avenue (DRP): A public‑initiated discretionary review for a 285‑sq‑ft accessory studio was approved after the applicant confirmed setbacks, mitigation for drainage and kiln venting, and staff recommended approval.
• 1027–1029 Clayton Street (DRP): After a neighborhood agreement and a sponsor concession to set back the ground‑floor deck by 2 feet on the west side, commissioners approved the project; motion to take the appeal (doctor) and approve with the modification passed unanimously 6–0.
Several items were handled on the consent calendar (approved without separate discussion after Item 4 was pulled). Where requested, commissioners and staff noted follow‑up steps — especially interagency or permit‑level reviews with Building and Fire Departments.
