Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Department proposes looser rules for bay windows and projections to encourage modern design
Summary
City planners proposed amending Planning Code section 136 to allow more flexible architectural projections and a zoning-administrator waiver for bay windows that do not meet current fine-grained standards; Historic Preservation Commission recommended approval and commissioners voted to adopt the changes.
Get email alerts on the Planning Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning Department asked the commission to amend Planning Code section 136 to ease dimensional restrictions on architectural projections and create a zoning-administrator waiver for bay windows that fail current variance tests. Audrey Buck, presenting the proposal, said the changes would remove the word “horizontal” from the text so vertical and diagonal projections (such as sunshades) could be considered, and would increase allowable projection depths in some public-right-of-way situations.
“Many of these designs additionally assist in increasing the environmental sustainability of buildings,” Audrey Buck said, arguing the change would allow innovative, energy‑efficient design while preserving appeal and appeals avenues.
Why it matters: The amendment is intended to reduce unnecessary variances and speed permitting for smaller projects while keeping an appeal path and design review intact. The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the changes and voted unanimously to recommend approval to the Board of Supervisors.
Public reaction: Architects and neighborhood designers who spoke in public comment supported the change as a practical modernization of rules that were written for Victorian-era forms. Opponents raised the need to preserve neighborhood character, but staff said design-review and other processes remain in place.
Outcome: Commissioners approved the measure as presented, noting staff would keep appeal routes and design review channels active for projects that might still require public oversight.
