Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Reinvestment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors weigh reserve vs. rapid release for $21M OEWD community investment
Summary
Board members debated whether to place $21 million recommended for community-led investments on Budget & Finance Committee reserve. Supporters said reserves give oversight; opponents, led by Supervisor Walton, warned reserves could slow funds meant for Black community reinvestment.
The Board of Supervisors' economic and workforce development funding — a $21 million pool intended for community-led reinvestment to support Black San Franciscans — prompted a sharp exchange on Aug. 20 over whether the funds should be placed in budget reserve or released quickly for community priorities.
OEWD Director Joaquin Torres told the committee the $21 million was designed to support a community-led allocation process guided by the Human Rights Commission and the mayor's office. "The purpose of that is to provide the opportunity for us to share...the public process and determinations that were made about how those dollars will be allocated," Torres said.
Supervisor Shimon Walton and others objected to placing the money in Budget & Finance Committee reserve on the grounds that it could delay urgently needed investments into the Black community and that a community-driven process should be allowed to move quickly. "Putting these resources on reserve may hamper the investment in the Black community," Walton said.
Dan Gonchar of the BLA explained that a reserve recommendation would require departments to return with a procurement and expenditure plan so the committee could review the proposed spending and staffing prior to release; he characterized the reserve step as a way to ensure oversight for a large new allocation.
Controller Ben Rosenfield told the committee that release from the committee reserve can be accomplished quickly — typically within one to two weeks once a release is requested — and noted that substantial expenditures above certain thresholds would anyway require return to the board for review.
The committee did not adopt a final policy decision in the hearing but directed the Controller and the BLA to work with OEWD and Supervisor Walton's office to develop a report and proposed path forward that balances community urgency and board oversight.
What happens next: The committee asked OEWD to return with a memo and a formal expenditure plan that provides transparency on procurement and timeline; the BLA and Controller will analyze administrative options for timely release if the committee prefers a faster path.
