Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utility Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee endorses refunds after SFPUC account errors totaling about $754,140

Budget and Finance Committee, San Francisco Board of Supervisors · September 11, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Budget & Finance Committee approved forwarding a resolution authorizing roughly $754,140 in refunds after SFPUC discovered incorrect utility user tax rates and misdirected remittances for certain customers; PUC staff said they will revise billing procedures to prevent recurrence.

The committee voted to forward a resolution authorizing payments totaling approximately $754,139.82 to San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) customers and a payment to Alameda County to correct utility user tax errors on electric accounts dating from June 2018 to January 2024.

Nancy Hamm, chief financial officer for SFPUC, explained staff discovered that certain transferred Hetch Hetchy power accounts had been billed and remitted incorrectly. In one example, the Oliver De Silva account at the Sonoma Valley aggregate quarry was charged San Francisco’s utility tax rate of 7.5% instead of the Alameda County rate of 6.5%, and taxes were remitted to San Francisco rather than Alameda County. The refund amount for that account was presented as $101,824.48; a separate customer (Sonal Ag Park) was found to have been charged when it should have been exempt, producing a credit of $339.94. Hamm said the department will revise policies and procedures—examining meter‑to‑billing processes and account setup—to avoid similar errors.

The Budget and Legislative Analyst reported the refunds will be paid by deducting incoming utility user tax revenues this year; the current budget of $110,700,000 did not assume these refunds and the adjustment could affect the general fund. Committee members asked what steps would prevent recurrence; Hamm said staff will document procedures and increase awareness when creating power accounts that cross jurisdictions.

With no public comment, the committee forwarded the resolution to the full Board with a positive recommendation.