Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Midyear Budget Cuts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee places $48.4 million of mayor’s midyear cuts on reserve to buy review time

Budget and Finance Committee · January 24, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee moved to place approximately $48.4 million in mayor-proposed midyear budget reductions into committee reserves so department spending would require committee approval. Chair Connie Chan framed the transfer as a way to continue negotiations while the city addresses a structural deficit.

The Budget and Finance Committee on Jan. 24 voted to place roughly $48.4 million of mayor-proposed midyear general fund budget reductions on the committee reserve, a procedural move that requires subsequent departmental spending to return to the committee for approval.

Chair Supervisor Connie Chan said the reserve action is intended to preserve department funds while supervisors and the administration continue negotiating how to address an identified multi-year structural gap. "Putting $48,000,000 on reserve allows us to continue that conversation," Chan said, noting projected deficits that guide the board’s caution.

The Budget and Legislative Analyst summarized the action as transferring mayor-proposed cuts to the committee’s reserve during an "unusual budget year," so that future spending from those appropriations will require concurrence from the mayor’s office and this committee. The BLA noted the midyear package included roughly $75 million in adjustments, with $48.4 million representing reductions placed on reserve and additional shifts moving general-fund spending to other revenues.

Committee members and dozens of public commenters described the local impacts of the proposed cuts. Commenters representing Larkin Street Youth Services, the Latino Parity & Equity Coalition, Episcopal Community Services, and other neighborhood groups urged restoration of relatively small line items—examples cited included $200,000 for food security programs for unhoused and unstably housed youth and $400,000 for workforce programming. "Those cuts won’t do anything significant to the budget but will have a massive impact on youth who need food," said Marnie Regan of Larkin Street Youth Services.

Chair Chan read a departmental breakdown of the $48.4 million: about $8 million from the Department of Public Health, ~$2.7 million from Economic and Workforce Development, ~$3.4 million from Homelessness and Supportive Housing, ~$5.2 million from the Human Services Agency, and roughly $8.2 million from mayoral office allocations—many of which fund housing and community development programs. Chan said the reserve placement preserves funds for further deliberation and possible restoration.

Outcome and next steps: The committee forwarded the ordinance to the full Board with a positive recommendation (roll call 3 ayes). Chair Chan and committee staff signaled the committee will continue negotiations with the mayor’s office and the BLA as the fiscal-year outlook evolves.

Speakers and documentation: The discussion cited the BLA report prepared for the committee; multiple community organizations provided public testimony urging restoration of specific programs. The committee’s action is procedural—placing appropriations on reserve—and does not itself spend funds beyond the current fiscal-year control requirements.

Votes and outcome: Committee voted 3–0 to forward the ordinance placing $48.4M on committee reserve to the full Board.