Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Puc Headquarters topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee delays vote on PUC water enterprise headquarters design contract after BLA flags procurement and scope issues

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee · May 4, 2022
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisors continued consideration of a $27.8 million design contract for PUC water‑enterprise headquarters after the Budget and Legislative Analyst raised procurement irregularities, disparities between the not‑to‑exceed amount and project budget, and policy concerns about an exemption to the city's campaign and governmental conduct code.

The Budget and Finance Committee on May 4 continued an ordinance that would approve a design professional services agreement with Mark Cavanero Associates for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s water enterprise city distribution division headquarters design work, citing outstanding procurement and policy questions.

The budget analyst told the committee the contract NTE is $27,800,000 for design services at a site on Maroon Street while reported construction costs could reach approximately $394,000,000. The BLA raised procurement concerns: two rounds of RFPs produced only one responsive bidder, and two proposals were disqualified for errors on cost forms. The analyst said the scale of the NTE compared with contract budgets in other projects was atypical and recommended further review.

The ordinance would also exempt the PUC’s proposed agreement from the city’s prohibition on behest payments to allow social impact partnership program commitments contained in the contract. Public commenter David Pilpel urged in‑house design work and opposed the behest‑payments exemption; supervisors and the BLA said additional justification and procurement detail are needed. Supervisor Peskin and others supported continuing the item to allow PUC to provide more documentation. The committee agreed and continued the matter to the call of the chair.